| |
|
|
 |
 |
Romania is a
country of extraordinary beauty, rich in natural resources, with a
well educated, talented population. It would be a wealthy country
too, if its people had the chance to compete fairly in a free market
system.
Four and a half decades of state socialism stifled talents and crippled
initiative. Yet post communist governments have not enacted the reforms
which are so essential for prosperity, preferring instead to protect
their own interests and prevent competition. Sometimes, they have
justified their inaction by claiming they want to safeguard living
standards. But the quality of life for the majority of Romanian citizens
is very low, with little protection for the most vulnerable members
of society. Street children, old people who cannot pay their winter
heating bills, and hospitals unable to afford medicines make a mockery
of politicians’ claims to be interested in social welfare. Worst
of all, this complete lack of real reform has resulted in Romania
falling very much behind its former communist-bloc partners, the majority
of which will become full EU members on May 1, 2004.
We believe that prosperity comes when the government interferes less
in citizens’ lives. Most enterprises are run best by the private
sector, because they have to compete, instead of relying on state
hand-outs. They cannot afford to be corrupt, because they will lose
money. They have to provide quality service to their customers because
they know that in a free society people can choose to take their business
elsewhere.
Far too much of the Romanian economy is still controlled by the government.
This has been a disaster. For instance, the state owned Bancorex made
loans to the government’s political cronies which were never
repaid. Millions of Romanian tax payers indirectly suffered when it
collapsed. There are still many unfair subsidies to loss-making state
companies, keeping taxes high, thereby stifling real economic growth
and perpetuating inefficiency.
We believe that prosperity comes when taxes are low, so citizens have
greater choice over how their money is spent. As experience in developed
countries has shown, low taxes are a win-win situation, because the
state in fact ends up collecting more money when the economy is stronger
and there is less tax evasion. The well known Laffer curve, named
after the economist who devised it, clearly demonstrates that if the
government puts taxes up too much, it ends up collecting less, because
more people find legal or illegal ways to avoid paying. Yet Romanian
taxes are among the highest in the region, while salaries are among
the lowest. |
What the government
should do is to provide an impartial legal system, which punishes
corruption and upholds fair competition in the free market economy.
Romanian justice is far from unbiased. Too many have escaped justice
through their connections, and many major scandals have never been
properly investigated. At the same time, access to the judiciary for
the ordinary citizen is difficult and expensive.
The government should also act as a genuine voice for Romanian citizens
in the wider world, promoting free trade and equal opportunities for
all in the global economy. It should aim to maximize the benefits
of membership of the EU Single Market by arguing against protectionism,
which does not serve the interests of Romanian citizens. “Transition
periods” before full application of Single Market principles
should be resisted. Romanians should be free to seek work in other
EU member states on the same terms as others, and should also have
opportunities to earn money in non-EU countries too, on the basis
of free market economics. Why should an employer in London be forced
by the state to hire a British worker rather than a Romanian, when
the Romanian is best for the job? Place of birth is immaterial to
professional competence.
We also believe that a free media is essential part of a prosperous,
democratic society, holding the leadership accountable before the
people. Although there is much fine journalism in Romania, there is
still too much government interference. Lack of competition, particularly
in the broadcast media has allowed cosy arrangements involving favourable
reporting of politicians’ activities in exchange for financial
concessions. We would like to see a quality mass media, offering choice
to the public and acting as a watchdog on the political class. |
The Romania
Think Tank aims to promote this vision through regular publications,
both printed and on line, and by encouraging a wide public debate
on the issues we care about. We will make contact with sympathetic
groups and individuals in business, politics, the media, academia
and culture both in Romania and abroad. We will organize conferences
involving both Romanian and foreign participants, and work closely
with similar institutions worldwide, especially in the United States,
the EU and other post communist countries.
Romanians have suffered forty five years of brutal communist rule,
followed by fourteen years of disappointment and wasted opportunities.
This cannot go on. Concerned citizens of all political persuasions
should work together to build the future Romania deserves, a future
of economic prosperity, and government genuinely accountable to the
citizen. |
|
|